Russ Allbery dijo [Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 03:41:18PM -0800]: > >> 1. Any member of the Technical Committee may propose a resolution. > >> This creates an initial two-option ballot, the other option > >> being the default option of "Further discussion." The proposer > >> of the resolution becomes the proposer of the ballot option. > > > Suggest making this "None of the above" instead of "Further discussion" > > to avoid two different default options for TC decisions vs project > > decisions. > > This was discussed briefly earlier, and for whatever it's worth was > intentional. My reasoning was that when the TC is asked to make a > decision, "None of the above" doesn't conclude that process. In the TC > case, it does seem to really mean "further discussion" in the sense that > the TC hasn't resolved the issue in front of them and has to keep > discussing it. > > That said, I don't feel strongly about this and can change this if folks > would prefer, particularly if TC members don't think that's the right way > to go.
<speak-with hat="technical-committee-member" ability="just-me"> I would prefer the change to extend also to the TC votes. I think it's clear that "none of the above" means we would not have an outcome to present, but I feel "none of the above" to be clearer. Besides, the TC does not only vote when mandated to make a decision; we could also host a vote on, say, prospective members to appoint to the TC. Take as an example bug #880014 — Had I not been appointed as a member, maybe there would be nothing left to discuss. Why mandate the then-TC to keep discussing my non-nomination ad nauseam? </speak-with>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
