Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> writes: > This constitutional change attempts to address those issues by > > * separating the Technical Committee process from the General Resolution > process since they have different needs; > * requiring (passive) consensus among TC members that a resolution is > ready to proceed to a vote; > * setting a maximum discussion period for a TC resolution and then > triggering a vote; > * setting a maximum discussion period for a GR so that the timing of the > vote is predictable; > * extending the GR discussion period automatically if the ballot changes; > * modifying the GR process to treat all ballot options equally, with a > clearer process for addition, withdrawal, and amendment; > * changing the default option for a GR to "none of the above"; and > * clarifying the discretion extended to the Project Secretary.
Seconded.
Although, I think you should fix A.2.3 which currently says:
> ... sponsors stepping forward, it removed from the draft ballot.
^
which I'd suggest needs an 'is', or perhaps 'will be', between 'it' & 'removed'
Cheers, Phil.
--
|)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] HANDS.COM Ltd.
|-| http://www.hands.com/ http://ftp.uk.debian.org/
|(| Hugo-Klemm-Strasse 34, 21075 Hamburg, GERMANY
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
