>>>>> "Timo" == Timo Röhling <t...@gaussglocke.de> writes:
Timo> * Mathias Behrle <mbeh...@debian.org> [2021-04-03 10:22]:
>> [ ] Further discussion [ ] Do nothing, leave the question
>> unresolved [ ] None of the above
Timo> The way I see it, all these have the same consequence for a
Timo> vote (that is, none of the other options is acceptable). The
Timo> Constitution will always permit another vote as long as K+1
Timo> developers introduce/sponsor it. And anyone who feels
Timo> particularly strongly about continuing/terminating the
Timo> discussion, will probably post it to debian-vote no matter
Timo> what.
I agree.
Also, as someone who has been in the position of interpreting votes,
having these options on the ballot would actually make that harder in
some cases.
