Kurt Roeckx <k...@roeckx.be> writes: > This is part where the constitution is really hard to parse, and it's > something I've struggled with for a long time. The terms are used in > conflicting ways. I hope someone will take the time to fix this.
Yeah, my apologies, I was going to fix this after the systemd GR and then never did. I've now made a better note of my intention. I think we have a few procedural GRs we should work through after the DPL election and this vote. > In A.1. there is: > 2. A formal amendment may be accepted by the resolution's proposer, in > which case the formal resolution draft is immediately changed to > match. > 3. If a formal amendment is not accepted, or one of the sponsors of > the resolution does not agree with the acceptance by the proposer > of a formal amendment, the amendment remains as an amendment and > will be voted on. > It's my current interpretation that no formal amendment was accepted. This is also consistent (unsurprisingly) with what we did with the systemd GR, after a lot of discussion of it at the time. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
