On Thu, 1 Apr 2021, Niels Thykier wrote: > Assuming that the letter from https://rms-support-letter.github.io/ is > signed by Debian, could we please have clarified up front how the above
There are evidently some who wish that there was more up front clarity about https://rms-open-letter.github.io/ too. Both letters have been added to the ballot completely unedited for the same reason - consistency of Debian's message with the wider ecosystem is of greater importance than precision. If you prefer different wording, I suggest you propose it as an amendment. > Notably, if it implies that Debian Developers some developers (e.g. > those who signed the open letter or voted certain elements on the ballot > higher than FD, etc.) would no longer be able to participate in DPL > votes, then I see this ballot as a change of our current constitutional > power (§4.1). > > Accordingly, I think this ballot should require a constitutional change > and a 3:1 majority or the text should explicitly state that no current > or future Debian Developer is considered a part of the "ambush mob". This GR is being made within the scope of §4.1.5 "They may also include position statements about issues of the day". I think you're reading more into this than the letter contains. If that was the implication then the proposer would have needed to specify a different section of the consitution for the resolution to be interpreted under. -- Phil Morrell (emorrp1)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
