Hi, On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 8:01 AM Kurt Roeckx <k...@roeckx.be> wrote: > > This would be a vote I would also like to see as secret. The
Maybe a solution would be to offer two alternatives of each option on the ballot—one as currently stated, and one that includes a secret vote instruction to the secretary. It would require an explanation to voters to clear up the confusion, but would result in the greatest legitimacy. As an alternative, all delegates and the DPL could perhaps vote to stay the release of voter identities until the electorate voted on the matter. As a stop-gap solution conceived to head off a constitutional crisis, it might work because there is no explicit promise of timeliness in the constitutional part that reads "after the vote the Project Secretary lists all the votes cast." Unfortunately, neither alternative will comfort voters afraid of reprisals, because there is no guarantee of privacy. Kind regards Felix Lechner
