On Thu, 2021-04-01 at 12:42 +0000, Jean Duprat (Avignon) wrote:
> Votes in leadership elections are kept secret even after the end of
> the voting period for obvious reasons: by knowing that the ballot is
> secret, voters can feel free to express their opinion as they see
> fit. This constitutional guarantee sadly does not apply to General
> Resolutions.
> 
> The GR currently being discussed, "Statement regarding Richard
> Stallman's readmission to the FSF board", is significantly more
> polarizing and controversial than any of the DPL elections the
> project has ever had. Due to various examples of attacks based on
> guilt by association fallacies [1] and similar that took place during
> the recent debate about RMS, voters may not be able to freely express
> their opinion on this GR if the tally sheet is made public at the end
> of the voting period. It is unfortunate that the consequences of
> simply expressing an opinion may include personal attacks, ostracism
> and even losing one's job, but we have seen enough evidence of that
> to know that it is the case. [2]
> 
> The nuances of why someone might decide against a collective
> endorsement of the statement by the Debian Project are entirely lost
> by looking at the tally sheet alone. Maybe you are terrified by mob
> justice. Perhaps you disagree with some of the most extreme opinions
> expressed in the appendix to the statement, including that using
> singular gender-neutral pronouns instead of "they" is enough to be
> found guilty of transphobia. You could even simply think that Debian
> as a Project should not participate in the current culture of fear
> and intimidation resembling McCarthyism more than the type of society
> we all aspire to live in.
> 
> Whatever the case may be, it is not safe to vote choice 3: "do not,
> as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms" unless the
> privacy of voters is guaranteed.
> 
> [1] https://twitter.com/sarahmei/status/1172744015885697025
> [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google%27s_Ideological_Echo_Chamber
> 

Hi Jean Duprat, 

Could you please provide any historical example of  your "mob justice"
?
Thank you.

Reply via email to