On 01/12/19 at 11:48 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: Withdrawing Proposal C; Option Ordering; CFV > Timing"): > > The reason I didn't reorder it yet, is because it's talked about > > like that. But I guess I can just reorder it on the page, keep the > > letter but change the number. > > Yes, please, do that.
+1 Or alternatively, a weaker option would be to just add a preamble saying: it has been pointed out that it is a good idea to read proposals in the following order (or its reverse): [...] Lucas