-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Brian Gupta writes ("Re: Proposal: Init Diversity"):
[ quoting Dmitry ]
> Being able to run Debian systems with init systems other than
> systemd continues to be value for the project. Package MUST work
> with pid1 != systemd, unless it was designed by upstream to work
> exclusively with systemd and no support for running without
> systemd is available.
>
> Software is not to be considered to be designed by upstream to
> work exclusively with systemd, merely because upstream do not
> provide, and/or will not accept, an init script.
>
> - ---
>
> Please consider the above version, and all future variants that
> contain nothing but grammar/wording changes, seconded by me. (As
> opposed to meaning changes.)
>
> e.g. - Maybe change "upstream do not provide" to "upstream does not provide"
> (I'm considering upstream a singular noun.)
Those aren't the grammar fixes I would be thinking of. I expect we
will sort those things out :-).
In the meantime, I also second this proposal.
My understanding of the process is that seconders do not have to
approve further changes. Instead, if there is a change we do not like
we can (and must) say that we object. But for the avoidance of doubt,
I also agree with Brian Gupta's comments about wording changes.
Thanks,
Ian.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQFUBAEBCAA+FiEEVZrkbC1rbTJl58uh4+M5I0i1DTkFAl3Wc44gHGlqYWNrc29u
QGNoaWFyay5ncmVlbmVuZC5vcmcudWsACgkQ4+M5I0i1DTnD+wgAv5qjHL8Bbkz3
syEe7MbE5gWsSA5gcXYYue2UCmKVW+MiavGjC1dFg+6FF7JDdD6BypFSLybKhVtJ
SuSaXlZhb+MG6a0zoYr101CMLr9si3KT2rTce8JRC6BXw91W2hwN9TRUsT+FyU3S
IBdp9vOUf1igaX3ftBPvnPjtb7G2ipLhndpnzwACy2KS2WT7L2EHNNMv+Tgz6R79
7AFJepV7SUrHlN2ILlNgwEaD0tGc5L7roOqPOP6atsA4YWtvU5ocfnjp2ymFRDFq
NirsgkQRSOVqQJukBBVMHnxYFZdjEQVys3uMpVHdj0qdD3L/9nAvbvDf0TcxZ+AT
YH03VcCJqg==
=1/ZV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
