On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 7:11 PM Dmitry Bogatov <kact...@disroot.org> wrote:
> > Here I formally propose new version of my draft, and withdraw all > previous versions of it. > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Being able to run Debian systems with init systems other than > systemd continues to be value for the project. Package MUST work > with pid1 != systemd, unless it was designed by upstream to work > exclusively with systemd and no support for running without > systemd is available. > > Software is not to be considered to be designed by upstream to > work exclusively with systemd, merely because upstream do not > provide, and/or will not accept, an init script. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhnHVzDbtdH7ktKj4SBLY3qgmEeYFAl3V0u8ACgkQSBLY3qgm > EeaOyA/8Cda8C+28KkOyby51V6vdThxuoK15qM/T6kBDwpvSHXxirlfeAXX+kBO9 > u6ktSDgbtzWzwTdbFWET+dc7LLhERMiJlTRUx8zfUmT0U9pFtxveF/xUsQscXyDK > wKOJh4jC+9Dl9HhK2B0C8JIhRSFhZq4iB9OaSUXeaBepZCyjk8X/M890Zone4P0Q > Dfs8vpEPn06QdknUWjYaIWd/5TLrny5GP26e8p7MdGkEf5DGAvsOQmUZn5mni/g2 > Y2KRmZWL1+UnGpkTjCYXyQOS2+X3hmoUO/yMfcKDTdEebV5Q80Z2JTC1vQChGQ5k > aOQaB4H88EqzZ5QWECrw/309TSqmzSKBExwoFHsVZ12F9kOE0TxWIJT52NwtwJzh > fM9AJCXVcKX0Y9Pt6O2QmzbxhWbmL0hp9dnYL0o6n2/4hu04+PiMTNCOMeZrxBVN > gQgpC6hBoQPQoMHrmYITSqA7jrPCWzaPaMFSfk1aITwYtdSKnjE70P5z0i0MZL31 > JMLAabUpAajU6jLxGA52svaSBYm67I4kka10MWuyrOoPqMSxRipF+ir1U8H0M/80 > 9wRjXiraw5j2/VrqBK2W/n43DvlZB0y3/XCgtXvkyhG+fE65NOaH/UKrn6covcZW > DB3NY8zifq2GzYlGDU5ZC5FLm2JfWzkWqmtz/CHUXWQqzA3F1Ro= > =p2r/ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Being able to run Debian systems with init systems other than systemd continues to be value for the project. Package MUST work with pid1 != systemd, unless it was designed by upstream to work exclusively with systemd and no support for running without systemd is available. Software is not to be considered to be designed by upstream to work exclusively with systemd, merely because upstream do not provide, and/or will not accept, an init script. - --- Please consider the above version, and all future variants that contain nothing but grammar/wording changes, seconded by me. (As opposed to meaning changes.) e.g. - Maybe change "upstream do not provide" to "upstream does not provide" (I'm considering upstream a singular noun.) Cheers, Brian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEErxE90OxJjNiEvcs2wPiGTNo9A1gFAl3WDfYACgkQwPiGTNo9 A1gE9g/+ODQyw0nhjep+HTf957NZ93aIINi2XOtc8iLAGDFTPadFHMTMup75l/fG WxHzJ+gLB/I/zhbGcodisWIoqVXtJeqQoKPMmRxYzlp6RLY08Jp5SzuIlaUtbjiF SJUw9W1vCtO1TGGOa7VVyJtPgG5FQQy+BSQtkNvB9gt/saVyMCzQm2LacxXLipUx 9J3KQEfBmbpnX8KZWALq8t+RjgWZd54kgm62j8aTUDa1f3qvJiV9m9xmhZdmELEe qR5k7usJvt5g+qUygiSj/WSeNuhcXg+thXAadSQpnsZNd/D5gVpMwa6mIV0iAUof xXlv2N/3CrTSlcspN86kQlUXoCms3MfFkf9iSX29DzjeCCP0m4E9FAIE/A+qahMV nf2BVU8KiSmYjWYBdAGBqExdLv8bwjry0gqYFQ1Htv8hIilja1knd2U8JniXCoNa C9W/EXIWncrRUxECLZYxFapXHlqXMEYTFtjE6EtboIix9ypQb9NTz59YAcutDFQM nN1bl6LgEnP+sJDPvT4HYSHhDdQC1ZU0keYQhyFHoVxTITA+ysJGVb1RPC2pZE6Z n+6L6yqrgOpp2w8PPOta7icJpCVdt0bUYCc2Erp/fIjGcuRBFqJlmXeHeklCS3Ta atRnKwNfjtGwIz4xH08y+udyJKkDcwfjnckNuHAJDMr2vEm6sB4= =2ZEK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > [2019-11-20 12:40] Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> > > Dmitry replied that this was not his intent, and explained his intent > > to me. He said he would welcome a proposed amendment. I don't have > > permission to quote his email, but I think I can capture his intent. > > FWIW, you have my permission to quote GR-related mails as needed. We are > on tight schedule. > > > For now, I propose the following amendment: > > [...] > > Thank you, Ian. I agree with your wording. Incorporated and formally > proposed. > > > I think the effect of this is: > > > > * For software that merely needs an init script writing, an init > > script MUST be provided (by the Debian maintainer, if necessary). > > > > * For software that needs other patches writing, it is up to the > > community to write patches for non-systemd support. The maintainer > > does not need to write them but MUST accept them if they are > > provided, because then "support for running with systemd is > > available". > > > > * Software that is inextricably tied to systemd is permitted, > > even though it only works with systemd as pid 1. > > This. I hope updated wording can't be read other way. > -- > Note, that I send and fetch email in batch, once in a few days. > Please, mention in body of your reply when you add or remove recepients. >