Svante Signell <svante.sign...@gmail.com> writes: > PID 1 should be as small as possible, see a proposed implementation in: > http://ewontfix.com/14/
That web page still cracks me up. Not only does the author have no idea how systemd works and makes multiple claims that are simply false, they have no idea how *sysvinit* works. You also have to love people who claim to be authorities on how other people should write code and then proceed to try to prove it with a model implementation that do no error checking whatsoever. Every time I look at that web page, I find another egregious error. This time, I just noticed that their minimal PID 1 implementation that they think is the be-all and end-all of PID 1 ends with a call to execve. I'm going to be laughing about that for the rest of the night. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87a94cyive....@hope.eyrie.org
