Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 11:03 +0000, Cord Beermann a écrit : > politically... we don't want to be list police. we don't speak enough > languages and don't have the time to do that. > > We run the lists, we have more enough to do to keep the spam level > low. > > So the step-in and adding a ban on someone personal is an action of > last resort (and was in fact a result of strong requests), when > all other things fail (and it takes really at least two for a > flamewar). > > If we really want to control about who is allowed to post to a > spoecific list, then we should switch over to moderation, and that has > to be handled by a moderators-team, which leaves the burden on other > people.
Without making the lists moderated, having a moderation team, that would be entitled to take such radical measures when necessary, would be an improvement in this direction. I guess that joins the "social committee" idea, although I don't like it much because it would mean a group of people would know better than others how to behave. -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
