Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > GR's are, in my opinion, meant to handle more general decisions, like > describing to what extent the listmasters are authorized to [silently] > take actions for keeping good order on the mailing lists, for what > actions the listmasters need the DPL's approval, and similar guidelines.
That's one opinion, but it's not what GRs can currently do. If that bothers anyone enough, amend the constitution instead of noisily refusing to support every GR that does stuff that GRs aren't "meant" to do. > > 7. We apologise publicly to everyone for not resolving this dispute > > I don't want to apologize in public to everyone for not having done any > publicly visible attempt to resolve this dispute. Cool. This proposal doesn't do that. It apolgises for not resolving it, not for not attempting. The bit you snipped even thanks everyone who has attempted, whether publicly-visible or not! > So I will not support this GR proposal. Maybe I might support a GR that > introduces practical guidelines for the listmasters and the DPL about > taking immediate actions to keep order on the mailing lists. I think it's very difficult to issue good practical guidelines, as it depends on humanity and too many variables. What is acceptable on debian-esperanto may be too offensive on debian-i18n, for example. Regards, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]