[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >On Wed, Aug 23, 2006, Matthew Garrett wrote: >> > This is a good proposition, as it does not allow firmwares already in >> > non-free (eg madwifi) to go into main. >> Madwifi contains non-free code that runs inside the kernel on the host >> processor. Whatever the project's opinion on firmware, madwifi is >> clearly non-free. > Yes, that's why we (including Aurélien) want to keep it in non-free. Like everybody else AFAIK, so it's not clear why this unrelated package is being used as an example.
-- ciao, Marco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
