Le mer 23 août 2006 11:28, Aurelien Jarno a écrit : > Josselin Mouette a écrit : > > Le mercredi 23 août 2006 à 09:48 +0100, Enrico Zini a écrit : > >>> 4. determines that for the purposes of DFSG #2, device > >>> firmware shall also not be considered a program. > >> > >> I'd personally prefer the 4th point to read: > >> > >> 4. determines that for the purposes of DFSG #2, device > >> firmware shall also not be considered a program until it will > >> become practical to do so. > > > > I like the idea, but I think it could be better worded. > > > > How about: > > 4. Determines that as a special exception to DFSG #2, source code > > for device firmware will not be required until we have the > > technical means to split them out in a convenient way for our > > users. > > > > (Not perfect either :/ ) > > Seconded. > > This is a good proposition, as it does not allow firmwares already in > non-free (eg madwifi) to go into main.
I agree, and I second that too. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgpXZUObfvxMZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature