Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is a good proposition, as it does not allow firmwares already in > non-free (eg madwifi) to go into main.
Madwifi contains non-free code that runs inside the kernel on the host processor. Whatever the project's opinion on firmware, madwifi is clearly non-free. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
