On Mon, 05 Jan 2004 12:10:21 +0000, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> As far as I have noticed, no-one has explicitly asked the minority
> who package for non-free to support the GR, unless they are involved
> in the infrastructure. Maybe they should, as there seem to be 120 or
Yes, I notices that this proposal is exclusionary. We are
supposed to be part of a community, and be aware of te tyrrany of the
majority.
> Interesting question: should only GRs that expect unanimity be
> proposed? I think that would be very limiting.
I have no idea what leap of illogic lead you to this question,
but if you propose a controvercial GR, then you should expect, hem,
controversy.
It would improve the chances of your GR if you at least
pretended to try and work with the people who are on the fence (and
even with the opposition, trying to reaqch a position that may have
broader support.
manoj
--
If this fortune didn't exist, somebody would have invented it.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
