On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 02:44:05PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > If not, how are dependencies from contrib on non-free software to be > > treated? Should the dependencies of contrib packages just be ignored > > version of libc6 only available in unstable or experimental? Or should > > contrib packages not depend explicitly on non-free packages at all? Or > > should something else happen? > Implementation details. This stuff should not be written into a GR, > any more than every other change to policy.
Well, the right answers aren't obvious to me; but if no one else cares, I'm all for dropping contrib too. That's certainly the least work. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we can. http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004
pgp6oHlpLASsh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
