On Sun, Nov 12, 2000 at 08:50:07PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > should i be required to support your proposal against my will and > > judgement? i'm certainly not going to vote for it so you lose > > nothing - and i imagine that you should be able to pick up the > > required number of sponsors for your proposal anyway...and if not > > then your proposal SHOULD be dropped due to lack of support. > > You don't understand the current situation, and so you should have > kept your mouth shut rather than tossing off your usual inanity.
as usual, you don't have a fucking clue what you are talking about. i understand the current situation - i just don't happen to be 100% in agreement with your interpretation of it. why don't you just mind your own fucking business and shut the fuck up? i'll second whatever fucking proposals i like and there's not one fucking thing you can do about it. it's childish arseholes like you who are making debian a very unpleasant place. wankers like you came on the scene and waste everyone's fucking time bickering about bullshit and irrelevancies. fucking loser. > The question is "is this a good form for the ballot to take". If your > will and judgement do not permit you to say YES, then you shouldn't > second it. you miss the fucking point. there's a big surprise, hey? MY will and judgement approves of proposal A but not proposal B. accordingly, i am only seconding proposal A. if you have a different opinion, and if you are a debian developer then you are entitled to second whatever proposal(s) you like in whatever manner you see fit. > Your history belies any claim that you are against childish > bickering. It's elementary email etiquette to read a thread through > before replying, especially when you are catching up on two months' > mail. i read as much of it as i could stomach last night. there seemed little of any real interest...just wankers like you crapping on with the same old bullshit. craig -- craig sanders
