On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 07:37:44PM -0800, C.M. Connelly wrote: > JC> I agree here. Let's take this opportunity to split them. > JC> List them both as foundational documents if we intend to > JC> do so, but split them regardless. > > Can we do that without a vote? ;-)
NFI, if we all think it should happen, I don't see why process should stand in the way of doing something harmless to the text file to match the way the project actually treats them. I've got a feeling it WOULD require another vote though, under IWJ's marvelous contribution to Debian procedural gridlock. -- Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3 Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org/) 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC The QuakeForge Project (http://quakeforge.net/) 44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3 <Knghtbrd> Okay, you people have started talking about BSDM applications of network hardware... I think I'll run off and do something useful and Debianish and stay OUT of this one... <Knghtbrd> (for a change)
