Buddha Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ----------
> 4.1. Powers
>
> Together, the Developers may:
> 1. Appoint or recall the Project Leader.
> - 2. Amend this constitution, provided they agree with a 3:1 majority.
> + 2. Amend the Foundation Documents of the Debian Project, provided
> + they agree with a 3:1 majority
> + 2.1 The Foundation Documents are the Debian Social Contract, the
> + Debian Free Software Guidelines, and this document, the
> + Debian Constitution.
I like this formulation. I don't even want to think the thought that
later changes to the consitutions makes it self-contradicting. Manoj's
proposal was of course not self-contradicting but sometime somebody
will propose to change 4.1.2 to require 10:1 majority to change the
Constitution without changing the propper part of 4.1.5.
The above formulation does prove the equallity of the Social
Contract/DFSG and the Constitution. Splitting SC and DFSG seems right
to me. We do mean different things when we're mentioning them. That
the SC referes to DFSG is not a problem.
--
"If I had been brought up in a different time [...] perhaps I'd
be totally comfortable in ML and would find C unsafe, a little
dangerous, not very expressive." - Brian Kernighan
