Hi,
>>"Buddha" == Buddha Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Buddha> Proposed Rule 5.2 says that developers can change certain "Foundation
Buddha> Documents" with a 3:1 majority. The first "Foundation Document"
Buddha> listed is is the Debian Constitution.
Ah. My mistake. Should we just not list the constituion under
foundation documents, then? Or leave it in, for now, since the
supermajority is exactly the same, and any changes to that would
require amending the constitution anyway, and we can deal with it if
it ever happens.
It kinda feels right having the constitution listed under
foundation docs ...
manoj
--
A language that doesn't have everything is actually easier to program
in than some that do. Dennis M. Ritchie
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
