-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I second this proposal (that is needed, right?)
The rest is just some comments on proposal A:
> 4. The Developers by way of General Resolution or election
>
> 4.1. Powers
>
> Together, the Developers may:
> 2. Amend this constitution, provided they agree with a 3:1 majority.
> + 5.2 Initially, the list of foundation Documents consists
> + of this document, The Debian Constitution, as well as the
> + documents known as the Debian GNU/Linux Social Contract and the
> + Debian Free Software Guidelines. The list of the documents
> + that are deemed to be "Foundation Documents" may be changed
> + by the developers provided they agree with a 3:1 majority.
Is it wise to let amendments to the constitution be regulated by two
rules? Why not drop the first rule to improve maintainability.
- --
"If I had been brought up in a different time [...] perhaps I'd
be totally comfortable in ML and would find C unsafe, a little
dangerous, not very expressive." - Brian Kernighan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.5 and Gnu Privacy Guard
<http://www.gnupg.org/>
iD8DBQE6CnxvobE/LCyLGVoRAr0KAKChJ4inBdT8c299JtvwLstBZ0niwwCdFNAc
5VzDEPVvVRkLiQXXSbmvdGU=
=2ics
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
