On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:26:04PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > For anyone still watching, I prepared a concise summary of Sven's behaviour > in d-legal here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/07/msg01308.html > I will admit it may not be the most conservatively phrased article, but bear > in mind it was written after being one of the butts of Sven's invective for > nearly a week.
And compared to my reply : http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/07/msg01311.html Which is much more constructive than anything *you* posted on that thread : Please, i started a new thread, where i provided a clear for for for analysis of the QPL, and identified the individual points which where coming into discussion, and started subthreads for each of them with my interpretation of them. If you feel like discussing this, in a way that leads to a resolution of this in a timely fashion, then you are welcome to it, if not please don't bother concerning yourself with the QPL in the ocaml case, since your intention would clearly be to dealy the issue until everyone who opposes you has left in disgust, and you can claim consensus. And remember that the issue got solved to everyones satisfaction without recurse to bogus dissident or other arguments, but using real DFSG analysis. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
