Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > and the early reaction of debian-legal when i first joined this disastrous > topic was not one to make debian-legal shine [...]
Probably not. The first reaction of Sven Luther wasn't good either. http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/07/msg00363.html > Clearly many of the debian-legal people > take their wish for realities, ..and clearly Sven has a mind-reading device. > and the fact that they are usually unopposed > comes mostly because they have more times to lose than others, ..or because most people agree when things are correct. > and usually > discourage reasonable people from participating constructively. ..when "reasonable" means "reasonably-large-flamethrower-holding". > > [...] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/07/msg01308.html > [...] the above was nothing but an ad-hominem attack on me > just because i didn't curb myself and bow to the all powerfull > consensus of debian-legal time-losers ? I think you'll find he attacked your past actions more than anything else. The low number of drinking games suggest that it takes more than just disagreeing to get that response. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
