On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 10:40:50PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > No, the package was not non-free, and the argumentation which > > brought said guy to claim consensus had been reached was not sound, > > nor was there real consensus i believe. > > So someone posted a bug report that wasn't really a bug?
Someone made me believe that debian-legal had reached consensus on this matter and that ocaml should be removed from main. The bug report was CCed to debian-legal, and my reply to debian-legal was unwilling, i didn't even notice before the tenth or so reply. Nobody in debian-legal corrected the misconception that consensus had been reached though, which means you all gave your tacit agreement to the reporters version. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
