* Chris Cheney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040714 21:55]: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 08:16:59PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > could you please try to not interpret things in Daniel's mail he didn't > > say? He didn't tell anything about his intentions to communicate about > > amd64, but just that he doesn't like it if private off-hand remarks > > are cited in public. And, if this communication was really private > > (and I have no doubt about that, as you didn't disagree with this > > statement), I can understand Daniel perfectly well. Please accept that > > most people doesn't like to get private communication cited in > > public, and I definitly would stop to give private remarks to somebody > > who might cite them in public.
> The statemtents were made via /msg on irc but he did not state that the > information was sensitive at that time. iirc I had told him there were > people wanting to know what was holding up the addition, I had no reason > to think the information he was telling me was sensitive either with > what little details he gave me. I didn't quote him in the email sent to > the list I just commented on the fact that he told me ftpmaster would be > making an official statement about what would be happening wrt the > archive. Well, obviously there is a massive disagreement about whether the contents of that talk were private or not. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
