On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 06:19:20PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Now there is a *different* question: should the current amd64 be in > sid? I can see no reason why not, but then, I wonder why you all > didn't get it in sid *long* ago. We put hurd-i386 in sid almost from > the very first day.
To be fair, bug #248043 was filed some time ago. It seems to me, after reading that bug, that getting the port into sid has been stalled on questions about the treatment of biarch [actually, probably more from the lack of an adequate statement of the nature of IA32 support than anything else]. There also seem to be some purely mechanical issues (for example, amount of free space on the servers). -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
