Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Currently, the destiny of amd64 is in the hands of the release manager > and FTP masters, but that's not in their "duties" to add it. However, > should the GR pass, I hope the DPL would have the honesty to remove the > delegates who would fail to comply with it.
The GR in question is inappropriate. It speaks about sarge. For me, the issue about sarge is settled: nothing should be in sarge unless it succeeds in sid and testing. Now there is a *different* question: should the current amd64 be in sid? I can see no reason why not, but then, I wonder why you all didn't get it in sid *long* ago. We put hurd-i386 in sid almost from the very first day. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
