I like it.
Some minor typos:
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 12:01:04PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> 3. Votes are taken by the Project Secretary. Votes and tallies results
> are not be revealed during the voting period; after the vote the
^^^^^^
s/not be/not to be/
>
> 2. We construct the Schwartz set based on undropped options and
> defeats:
>
> c. An option, A, defeats an option, B, if N(A,B)*V(A,B) is
> larger than N(A,B)*V(B,A), and the (A,B) defeat has not
^^^^^
That should be N(B,A)
> 3. If there are defeats within the Schwartz set, we drop the weakest
> such defeats, and return to step 2.
>
> b. A defeat (A,X) is weaker than a defeat (B,Y) if A is not
> the default option and V(A,X) is less than V(B,Y). Also,
> (A,X) is weaker than (B,Y) A is not the default option and if
^^^^^^^
Should be "(B,Y) if A"
> 3. If there are no defeats within the Schwartz set, then the winner
> is chosen from the options in the Schwartz set where at least at
> least Q voters ranked that option above default option, where Q
s/at least at least/at least/
--
.+'''+. .+'''+. .+'''+. .+'''+. .+''
Juan Cespedes / \ / \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.+' `+...+' `+...+' `+...+' `+...+'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
