On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 11:38:12AM -0500, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> Second, I don't think that the disadvantages of this approach have
> been adequately addressed. You have focused almost entirely on one
> aspect ("what supermajority is about") as if it were the only one to
> consider. Given the subtelties of voting, this seems like a rather
> extreme position.
I think you're overgeneralizing. [I'd prefer to focus on specific
criticism.]
I'll note that comparison to the default option has the properties of
Approval (and that the default option isn't really a "candidate", but
a vote of no-confidence), and that ranking among options which defeat
the default option has the properties of Condorcet.
--
Raul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
