Re: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] Disambiguation of 4.1.5

[Raul Miller]

On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 05:36:23PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > Then how can they possibly be voted on together?

On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 03:04:08AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Under A.2.3.
> 
>     3. The person who calls for a vote states what they believe the
>        wordings of the resolution and any relevant amendments are, and
>        consequently what form the ballot should take. However, the final
>        decision on the form of ballot(s) is the Secretary's - see 7.1(1),
>        7.1(3) and A.3(6).

On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 06:40:03PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> This says the final form of the ballot is a consequence of the original
> proposal (duh) and any amendments (of which there are none), though,
> not that a ballot can be made up of whole cloth.

That's not what it says.

That's your interpretation of what it says.

I think many of us understand your interpretation, but please realize
that it is an interpretation.

Thanks,

-- 
Raul


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]