Re: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] Disambiguation of 4.1.5

[Branden Robinson]

On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 05:36:23PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 02:33:56AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 03:32:41PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > But I don't see how this fits in with the constitution. We're operating,
> > > I presume, under the `standard resolution procedure', ie appendix A. We've
> > > has a proposal (Branden's, I guess) which has been proposed and seconded,
> > > and we've had discussion and an amendment (Manoj's) which has apparently
> > > received the appropriate number of seconds (A.1.1), and is presumably
> > > being treated under A.1.3.
> > Wrong, wrong, wrong.
> > Manoj's and my proposals are wholly independent procedurally.  This has
> > been stated time and time again.  One of them is NOT an amendment to the
> > other.
> 
> Then how can they possibly be voted on together?

Under A.2.3.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson             |    There's nothing an agnostic can't do
Debian GNU/Linux                |    if he doesn't know whether he believes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]              |    in it or not.
http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |    -- Graham Chapman

PGP signature