Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Joey" == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
>  Joey> So we issue DFSG v2, a new document that just happens to include the
>  Joey> text of DFSG v1 verbatim, except for oner paragraph.
> 
>       I think that is what should be done in any case, if this GR
>  passes. We leave the DFSG around (since other people and projects
>  have defined themselves around the DFSG, and they may not wish to
>  change). (historical reasons also present themselves).
> 
>       If the GR passes, the project can choose to adopt DFSG-2 (-3,
>  -4, ...) as we wish.

Makes sense to me. Except, I think I mispoke and the GR doesn't actually
touch the DFSG at all, just other parts of the Social Contract.

-- 
see shy jo


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to