Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >>"Joey" == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Joey> So we issue DFSG v2, a new document that just happens to include the > Joey> text of DFSG v1 verbatim, except for oner paragraph. > > I think that is what should be done in any case, if this GR > passes. We leave the DFSG around (since other people and projects > have defined themselves around the DFSG, and they may not wish to > change). (historical reasons also present themselves). > > If the GR passes, the project can choose to adopt DFSG-2 (-3, > -4, ...) as we wish. Makes sense to me. Except, I think I mispoke and the GR doesn't actually touch the DFSG at all, just other parts of the Social Contract. -- see shy jo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal John Goerzen
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Craig Sanders
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Joey Hess
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Steve Greenland
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Adam Heath
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive remo... Joey Hess
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive remo... Joseph Carter
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive remo... Craig Sanders
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive remo... Jordi Mallach
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive remo... Manoj Srivastava
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive remo... Joey Hess
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive remo... Craig Sanders
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Hamish Moffatt
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Branden Robinson
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Hamish Moffatt
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Branden Robinson
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Jordi Mallach
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Martin Schulze
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Marcus Brinkmann
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Steve Greenland
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Peter S Galbraith