Adam Heath wrote: > Issue, but doesn't say a thing about modifying preexisting documents and > statements. So we issue DFSG v2, a new document that just happens to include the text of DFSG v1 verbatim, except for oner paragraph. > This is the same as the old "Who does Debian Admin answer to?" thread. It seems more like the "I don't want this to happen, so I will be a rules lawyer" thread to me. -- see shy jo, who doesn't like the GR, but dislikes apptempts to prevent it by rules-lawyering even less. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal John Goerzen
- CFV: Proposed amendment by Anthony Towns Chris Lawrence
- Re: CFV: Proposed amendment by Anthony T... Chris Lawrence
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Craig Sanders
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Anthony Towns
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal John Goerzen
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Craig Sanders
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Joey Hess
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Steve Greenland
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Adam Heath
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive remov... Joey Hess
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive remov... Joseph Carter
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive remov... Craig Sanders
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive remov... Jordi Mallach
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive remov... Manoj Srivastava
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive remov... Joey Hess
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive remov... Craig Sanders
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Hamish Moffatt
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Branden Robinson
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Hamish Moffatt
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Branden Robinson