Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > your CFV is unconstitutional because nothing in the consitution allows > the Social Contract or DFSG to be amended. <pragmatism> Nothing in the constitution specifically says that Craig Sanders can post to debian-vote, so your e-mail is unconstitutional. </pragmatism> Really, get a dose of reality here. It's not your decision to make, nor do the facts support your assertion. -- -- John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- CFV: Non-free archive removal John Goerzen
- CFV: Non-free archive removal Matthew Vernon
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Buddha Buck
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal John Goerzen
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Matthew Vernon
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal John Goerzen
- CFV: Proposed amendment by Anthony Towns Chris Lawrence
- Re: CFV: Proposed amendment by Anth... Chris Lawrence
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Craig Sanders
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Anthony Towns
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal John Goerzen
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Craig Sanders
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Joey Hess
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Steve Greenland
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive remov... Adam Heath
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive r... Joey Hess
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive r... Joseph Carter
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive r... Craig Sanders
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive r... Jordi Mallach
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive r... Manoj Srivastava
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive r... Joey Hess