On Sun, Mar 30, 2025 at 05:59:09AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: [...]
> I'm evidently have not conveyed the import of what I have termed "spurious". > It is *NOT* the same as saying something is spam. No, Richard. The issue is that you point to a problem here and don't give people willing to help debugging it *anything* to chew on. Saying "there are mails I don't consider appropriate for that list" according to some vague criteria without actually *showing* one or three samples is just... unfair. People then lose interest in helping out. That's what happens. Cheers -- t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
