On Mon 24 Mar 2025 at 06:34:05 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
> Since the beginning of February I've been receiving what I consider
> spurious emails.

> The only change to my setup {to best of my memory} was subscribing to
> the "debian-...@lists.debian.org" mailing list.

On Fri 28 Mar 2025 at 08:00:59 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
> Further investigation suggests a human *explicitly* sent all
> "desirable" emails to debian-...@lists.debian.org .
> I.E. When SeaMonkey displays header content onscreen, To: *OR* Cc:
> contains "debian-...@lists.debian.org".
> No "spurious" email has that in *EITHER* of those fields.
> [I don't know enough about email mechanics to understand how the
> "spurious" emails do get sent by some automatic mechanism.]

So would it be true to say that the only connection between these
"spurious" emails, aka spam, and debian-www is that the former
started soon after you subscribed to the latter?

On Mon 24 Mar 2025 at 06:34:05 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
> Where/how do I report this?

You say SM can display the header content. If an email comes from
a Debian list, then the header will be many lines long, and mention
bendel.debian.org about a dozen times, generated as the post wends
its way from poster to you. If you think such a post is spam, you
can report it by pressing the button (top right corner) on the
web page for that post in the archive,
https://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2025/MM/msg00NNN.html

If the header is short, showing perhaps two or three "Received:"
lines, with no mention of bendel, then it's unlikely to have anything
to do with the "Debian hierarchy", whatever that is.

Cheers,
David.

Reply via email to