On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 19:06:40 -0500, gene heskett wrote: > On 12/3/24 14:32, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > Note that pocket's system has /sbin pointing to usr/bin NOT to usr/sbin.
> > On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 09:44:32 -0500, Felix Miata wrote: > > > > > Bookworm looks to be one of the last of the Mohicans: > > > > I'm not sure what you mean by that. > That, Greg, refers to a less than pleasant time in 'merican history when the > only good American indian was a dead one. The Mohicans were [...] I'm not talking about the historical reference. I'm talking about the assertion that bookworm is an outlier. Bookworm is NOT an outlier here. It's just like all the others. It has a separate sbin, NOT a subsumed sbin. See this part? > > > PRETTY_NAME="Debian GNU/Linux trixie/sid" > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 8 Oct 16 2022 sbin -> usr/sbin > > > > > PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS" > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 8 Dec 8 2023 sbin -> usr/sbin > > > drwxr-xr-x 2 1.0K Feb 2 2024 sbin.usr-is-merged > > > > > PRETTY_NAME="KDE neon 6.2" > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 8 Jun 2 2024 sbin -> usr/sbin > > > drwxr-xr-x 2 1.0K Aug 20 2022 sbin.usr-is-merged > > > > > PRETTY_NAME="openSUSE Tumbleweed" > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 8 Sep 25 15:10 sbin -> usr/sbin > > > > > PRETTY_NAME="Fedora Linux 39 (Thirty Nine)" > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 8 Jul 20 2023 sbin -> usr/sbin > > > > All of these systems have sbin pointing to usr/sbin (the same as > > bookworm), NOT to usr/bin the way pocket's system does. Pocket's (Arch??) system is the outlier. Not bookworm.
