On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 03:42:30PM +0000, Andy Smith wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 11:35:15AM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > I'd rather not mess around with stuff I don't really understand > > without an official guide to the process. > > I don't mean this to be snarky, but that desire seems incompatible > with running Debian sid. I honestly think it's an unreasonable > expectation to want official guides for every transitory broken > state in a development tree. >
If you run Sid, you are *expected* to be able to solve all your own problems. There are no guarantees other than if it breaks, you get to keep both pieces :) I recognise your name: you are an experienced user, but if you're not ready for speed of change / likelihood of serious breakage, please *don't* run Sid. The pace of change is high - apart from the freeze period prior to a major release, the likelihood of random breakage is very high. If there is a major transition (versions of GNOME, Qt versions for KDE, usrmerge for example) you could run into breakages that will last a few weeks. This is not the place for debugging Sid, I'm afraid, there are too few of us here that would run Sid normally. All the very best, as ever, Andy (amaca...@debian.org) > Asking if a specific thing is a known issue that is being worked > on? Sure. Expecting it to be documented before any user hits it? Not > so much. > > Thanks, > Andy > > -- > https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting >
