On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 1:46 PM Frank <zuiderd...@gmx.com> wrote: > > Op 18-04-2023 om 16:33 schreef Vincent Lefevre: > > On 2023-04-15 21:59:19 +0200, Frank wrote: > >> Op 15-04-2023 om 18:12 schreef Tixy: > >>> Testing doesn't get explicit security support so there's no point in > >>> having 'testing-security' lines in sources.list (I guess it'll give an > >>> error anyway). > >> > >> No error. It exists but as a perpetually empty repository. > > > > This is incorrect. > > > > cventin:~> apt-show-versions -a libtpms-dev > > libtpms-dev:amd64 0.9.2-3.1~deb12u1 testing-security security.debian.org > > No stable version > > No stable-updates version > > libtpms-dev:amd64 0.9.2-3.1 testing ftp.debian.org > > libtpms-dev:amd64 0.9.2-3.1 unstable ftp.debian.org > > No experimental version > > libtpms-dev:amd64 not installed > > libtpms-dev:i386 0.9.2-3.1~deb12u1 testing-security security.debian.org > > No stable version > > No stable-updates version > > libtpms-dev:i386 0.9.2-3.1 testing ftp.debian.org > > libtpms-dev:i386 0.9.2-3.1 unstable ftp.debian.org > > No experimental version > > libtpms-dev:i386 not installed > > Interesting. Like Tixy, I was under the impression testing didn't > receive security support. I remember checking that several times over > the years. Curious.
I did not think so, either. But have a look at https://www.debian.org/security/faq#testing and https://wiki.debian.org/DebianTesting . Jeff
