On 2023-04-15 21:59:19 +0200, Frank wrote: > Op 15-04-2023 om 18:12 schreef Tixy: > > On Sat, 2023-04-15 at 08:11 -0400, pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote: > > > > According to https://www.debian.org/releases/, bookworm at this time is > > > "testing". But when the next release comes, bookworm will still be > > > bookworm, but "testing" will be bookworm "plus". I'd like to follow > > > testing, regardless of the status of Debian official releases. > > > > > > So... in my sources.list, if I change "bookworm" to "testing", will it > > > do that, and (other than the instabilities of testing) is there any > > > liability to it? > > > > Testing doesn't get explicit security support so there's no point in > > having 'testing-security' lines in sources.list (I guess it'll give an > > error anyway). > > No error. It exists but as a perpetually empty repository.
This is incorrect. cventin:~> apt-show-versions -a libtpms-dev libtpms-dev:amd64 0.9.2-3.1~deb12u1 testing-security security.debian.org No stable version No stable-updates version libtpms-dev:amd64 0.9.2-3.1 testing ftp.debian.org libtpms-dev:amd64 0.9.2-3.1 unstable ftp.debian.org No experimental version libtpms-dev:amd64 not installed libtpms-dev:i386 0.9.2-3.1~deb12u1 testing-security security.debian.org No stable version No stable-updates version libtpms-dev:i386 0.9.2-3.1 testing ftp.debian.org libtpms-dev:i386 0.9.2-3.1 unstable ftp.debian.org No experimental version libtpms-dev:i386 not installed -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
