On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 17:20:11 +0300 George Shuklin <george.shuk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My point was that 'sh' approach (including > bash and dash) is really, really bad. Bash as a programming language > is super tricky, with lots of landmines and almost no validation > whatsoever for errors (there is a bit, but way less than expected > from any modern system language). Something that may help this problem is shellcheck. If you use emacs, you can have emacs check on the fly with package elpa-flycheck. I expect other editors have similar support. -- Does anybody read signatures any more? https://charlescurley.com https://charlescurley.com/blog/
