> UTC Time: July 9, 2017 9:41 AM
> From: scdbac...@gmx.net
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Hi,
> Andy Smith wrote:
>> I don"t think they care who receives the blowback.
> Just for sports i bet on the intention to annoy us and possibly the
> reflector mailers.
> (I am still undecided whether the reflectors are real.)
> I am subscribed to several lists. Among them only debian-user gets
> this special kind of spam. Do we have a dedicated enemy ?
> Damn. So close and still not enough:
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.8 required=4.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,GENDER,
> HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
> THREADTOPIC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
> version=3.4.0
> ...
> Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2017 11:12:43 +0200 (CEST)
> I wonder how many of these got caught with scores above 4.0 already.
> Have a nice day :)
> Thomas

I remember 2 months ago I had received a response from what appeared
as a list member responding to some spam that was sent by me to the list.
The response was something like
>
>
what?
So I fell for it and responded to this and the list telling everyone I had not
sent such email, or it didn't really come from my system. People were
asking me for headers where all I got was a message of the fake response
with minimal headers.
Maybe at the time they were fishing for how the mailist worked. But this
conversation has gone viral itself.

Reply via email to