On Tue 11 Apr 2017 at 14:24:00 (+0000), GiaThnYgeia wrote: > xxx: > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 6:21 AM, GiaThnYgeia > >> Has Debian always been this crazy and am I so new to this madness? > > > > Moving the goalposts always generates a bit of madness. Whether this > > time is turning out more so than previous times I'll leave for others > > to comment on. > > Moving the goalposts is a decision that weighs on those exact > individuals that made it, not the entire community. > > Let me ask this encyclopedic question. Would newer server hardware > benefit more from the anticipated sysv development or from the systemd? > I suspect that a 4 year old server had a 20% capability improvement with > systemd development while a 1 year old server had a 40% improvement, > despite the fact that the 1 year old one was 4 times as capable as the > older one. With sysV i suspect the development would maybe affect 24%, > on both. So was the choice made on the basis of exploiting ever newer > hardware or to continue the human support of those employing Debian for > years? Disregarding community and bending over to industry, that is! > > I have no real data to prove this, I am only suspecting this to be true.
What's the point of making stuff up and posting it then? Just trolling? > Sometimes sticking to principles and protecting the survivability of the > organization becomes contradictory. What is meant by "free" is getting > hazier and hazier. It is now a gray area of market logic. > The question then becomes, as has always been, whose side are you on > boys? And when I say boys I mean the decision making few that usually > are boys anyway, unlike the woman that wrote the song. I've no idea what all this is about. Cheers, David.
