On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 06:21:22PM +0000, Amir H. Firouzian wrote: > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Henning Follmann <hfollm...@itcfollmann.com> > wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 06:12:36PM +0000, Amir H. Firouzian wrote: > > > It's not my point of view, It's P2P philosophy. > > LOL, you really crack me up. P2P philosophy? Seriously? > > Is that taught at some university? Can you have a P2PhD there? > > * Go and visit MIT for CS (& wish that I will visit too!). > http://freehaven.net/ > >
Ok, that is ONE! P2P project which happen to have these values you claim are universal to P2P in general. I am happy that you found an existing project which aligns with your personal "philosophy" that however doesn't make this universal to all P2P. So it is a personal opinion. > > > > > > > > if you consider the project that try to collect Internet Informations; > > This > > > philosophy seems to be rational. > > > > And this sentence doesn't even make sense. > > What project? > > And if there is a "project" how does the existence automatically imply that > > it is the highest priority to prevent this from happening > > > > * First, Sensation > > needs Informations > > . Second, N > owadays > "Project" isn't so > secret > ! > Can you be more opaque? What the hell are you talking about? And define how to come from the existence of a "project" to come to a mandatory value hierachy. -H -- Henning Follmann | hfollm...@itcfollmann.com
