-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:06:49AM -0500, John Hasler wrote: > tomas writes: > > To me, it's just a thinly veiled way of moving things to a flat-tax > > scheme, for the benefit of the rich (yes, I know about the official > > rationale) > > Don't you mean a head tax? "Flat tax" usually refers to a tax that is a > fixed percentage of all income (or of all expenditures, which comes to > the same thing).
Yes, that's probably more correct. - -- t -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlXLsRUACgkQBcgs9XrR2kYuCgCeJTFTkHLJcGoFz+ih+b//JIV7 ynYAnjJnhSvedj3aL6P5+e+1oUPqB7Ot =gVo4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
