Hi. On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:29:08 +0100 Peter Viskup <skupko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's the way you look at. > For me it's about prevention...your child can click on some link somewhere > and see some pictures/videos which will remain in his/her mind (let's say) > forever and can harm even if it was only seconds they were seen...I am > speaking about children less than 15 years old...and even older children > needs protection. And just as well child can see a naughty picture on TV. Or a phone ad. Or a magazine/newspaper. Anywhere, once you start thinking about it. Whatever damage is done depends on child's state of mind, which is influenced by his/her prior education. Which, for the most part, should be (IMO) provided by parents first, and society (friends, school, whatever) - second. And internet censorship is not a substitute of education. The only thing that censorship can teach is how to workaround it. Or that one's parents are complete <insert_some_profanity_here>. Is that how you want your children to perceive you? Besides, what's up with this 15 years mark? Why 14 is too early, and 16 is too old? For example, puberty is considered starting at 12 where I live, full civil rights are granted at 18. Reco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150326181312.f08aaed0a70439a2c935d...@gmail.com
