Hi. On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 13:21:57 +0100 Peter Viskup <skupko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > just jumped into SSLBump/Split features some months ago. I don't find these > features harmful. Especially when protecting your children from access of > YouTube or other possibly harmful sites. Once you are logged with Google > account they redirect your communication to https which makes the > inspection not possible. The Squid's SSLBump/Split (whose name in latest > version SslPeekAndSplice) is the only feature which will make the > inspection happen. This means there are still some cases where this feature > is very helpful and the only one freely available. If you're considering that spying on your own children is a good idea - I don't even know what to say. They solve such problems here by educating children, not limiting their internet access. Besides, if a child would really want to bypass such access control - he or she will find a way sooner or later (hint - a cellphone, for instance). The only good usage of SSL Bump in my book is reverse-engineering certain proprietary applications. Recp -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150326155150.246957029666332067526...@gmail.com
