On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 6:37 AM, Andrew McGlashan <[email protected]> wrote:
> My own view is "why systemd" .... fix sysinit instead, where it is > broken or rather the packages [whatever they are] that don't work properly. Who should fix sysvinit? The upstream sysvinit developers are DDs and they didn't do it (I'm not blaming them, I'm just noting that fact). > systemd gives faster boot times, so what! I prefer to boot less often > and run with what works until I /have/ to do a reboot, so it wouldn't > matter if it took 10 times as long to boot. Improving boot times is > just like overclocking for games, it is largely irrelevant and something > to boast about ... ie, no real benefit. Boot speed might not be an important feature for you but for organizations with 1000s of servers, the faster the better. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAOdo=SxKfsc6pMntDLC7+XfFq_AfqpadUeU_d11QNO=8prl...@mail.gmail.com
